Highlight
Successful together – our valantic Team.
Meet the people who bring passion and accountability to driving success at valantic.
Get to know usJune 25, 2026
It’s Monday morning at a medium-sized machinery manufacturer: A supplier reports a delay on a component. A rush order is pushing its way into the production pipeline. Two other orders are competing for the same machine. An employee reconciles the situation across several Excel spreadsheets, calls the production department, and makes a decision that will already be outdated in two hours. Scenes like these are part of everyday operations at many manufacturing companies. And it is precisely for such challenges that artificial intelligence promises a solution.
AI already ranks as the number one technology in the manufacturing industry, according to a key finding in the Digital Excellence Outlook 2026* by the Handelsblatt Research Institute and valantic. Around 82 percent of survey respondents are convinced that AI will be the most relevant technology trend by 2030.
Expectations are high. Yet there is a significant gap between ambition and the productive use of AI: Although half of manufacturing companies view AI as a key strategic component, only 41 percent have so far implemented the technology comprehensively and strategically. The majority is experimenting with individual pilot projects in isolated departments.
This reality is also reflected in our conversations with customers and industry decision-makers. The question is no longer “What can AI do?” but rather “Where should we start to ensure that AI really pays off?”
The following assessment summarizes key findings from the study and prioritizes AI applications whose benefits already justify the investment today.
First things first: The priorities of manufacturing companies in the study differ significantly from those of the overall market under examination. The clear focus in the manufacturing sector is on operational and product-centric use cases. Four areas in which the greatest AI potential is emerging:
In manufacturing, the quoting process is often the bottleneck. Complex, specialized products, long bills of materials, technical clarifications with the design team: it can take days or even weeks before a solid quote reaches the customer. AI in its latest evolutionary stage – Agentic AI – delivers immediate added value here: Autonomous agents interact with other systems, prepare decisions, and execute data-driven actions.
Among study respondents, product and application development ranks first in terms of both relevance (91 percent) and implementation (56 percent). This means that the industry not only considers this use case important but is already implementing it on a large scale. For example, AI agents can retrieve specifications from Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), cross-reference them with price and availability data, and use this information to create a draft quote that sales representatives simply need to review.
The most profitable aspect of manufacturing isn’t always the sale of machinery and equipment. It’s long-term service. Fast, expert support in the event of malfunctions, easy reordering of replacement and wear parts, on-time deliveries, and predictive maintenance:
All of this requires dynamic availability and feasibility logic —that is, real-time checks that confirm whether an order can be delivered by the desired date (Available to Promise, ATP) and whether capacity is available to fulfill the order (Capable to Promise, CTP). Both logics must simultaneously take material, capacity, and logistics planning into account. Here, too, AI can lighten the load: It checks and analyzes in real time, identifies patterns and bottlenecks, makes suggestions, and dynamically adjusts delivery promises—faster and with greater granularity than any rule-based system.
Monthly planning using static Excel spreadsheets can no longer structurally reflect market volatility. AI-powered, constraint-based planning tools replace this static logic with adaptive, event-driven plans. The potential of AI is also recognized: supply chain optimization ranks among the most important use cases for 91 percent of industrial companies. However, only about 49 percent of survey respondents are already using AI for supply chain management.
What is often missing is a central, integrated database serving as a single source of truth across all relevant systems and processes—such as between Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS), Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), and Manufacturing Execution System (MES).
Our project with MAN Energy Solutions demonstrates how AI-optimized production planning can succeed in practice: Using the waySuite APS system, the company integrates IT-supported planning processes across the entire value chain—from quoting, project management, engineering, production and workforce planning, procurement, scheduling, and supplier tracking to testing and assembly.
AI does not replace skilled workers; rather, it amplifies their impact. AI assistants can directly simplify knowledge work by preparing technical documentation and turning research and routine tasks into a matter of minutes.
According to the study, only 46 percent of industrial companies currently possess advanced AI capabilities and regularly invest in expanding them. 49 percent report that they are only gradually building a foundation. What is particularly important here is the white-box approach. AI recommendations for software-defined design and development must be transparent so that engineers can trust them.
The study’s most significant finding does not concern individual use cases, but rather companies’ AI maturity levels. Depending on how deeply the technology is integrated and embedded within an organization, it can yield very different results.
So far, according to their own assessments, only 30 percent of the manufacturers surveyed report a high level of AI maturity—significantly less than the overall market average of 36 percent. Yet among these few pioneers, the potential of AI is particularly evident:
In about 82 percent of cases, they report time savings, 76 percent report improvements in output quality, and 73 percent report increased efficiency. For companies that remain in the experimental middle ground, these figures drop to about 66 percent (time), 68 percent (quality), and 69 percent (efficiency).
The industry-wide average is dragged down by the large middle group. This is the key insight: Success is determined not by the AI model, but by the organization’s AI readiness. Data, processes, roles, and clear responsibilities must be prepared for AI.
Three key findings from the study should also be mentioned in this holistic assessment:
The gap between expectations and reality is not due to technological limitations. It stems from structural bottlenecks: the depth of integration, prioritization, and decision-making authority within organizations.
Three key takeaways from the study that have also proven effective in real-world AI projects:
AI models are mature, many applications have been tested in real-world use, and success stories from industry pioneers show that the transition from pilot projects to full-scale production has long been feasible. What matters is not chasing the loudest trend, but analyzing and honestly weighing which use case is compatible with the available data, internal resources, and AI expertise—so that it can move beyond the experimental phase into productive, scalable deployment.
Turning knowledge into a competitive edge: Where does your organization stand?
Planning excellence matters: Our meta-study, which includes a readiness assessment and the Plan-to-Win Framework, provides a structured roadmap for leveraging AI’s potential and achieving initial results in 90 days.
Fabian Littau
Director Industry Business | Prokurist
valantic
*The findings in Digital Excellence Outlook 2026, published by valantic in collaboration with the Handelsblatt Research Institute, are based on a quantitative survey of more than 1,000 executives from companies in the DACH region, including 312 decision-makers from the manufacturing and production sectors, supplemented by in-depth qualitative interviews with C-level executives from international corporations.
Don't miss a thing.
Subscribe to our latest blog articles.